She Who Must Not Be Named

“Should she become president, Palin seems capable of enacting policies so detached from the common interests of humanity, and from empirical reality, as to unite the entire world against us.” - Sam Harris, “When Atheists Attack”, Newsweek, Sept. 29, 2008 http://www.newsweek.com/id/160080/output/print

Reasons why people may be fooled into voting for Sarah Palin, and why we shouldn’t let ourselves be fooled into believing the Republican hype.

1. “She’s a mom, and she knows what it’s like to be a mom.” So she can (and has) spawned, big deal. So can (and has) the skunk that visits my backyard. That doesn’t qualify the skunk to be Vice President, and neither does it qualify Sarah Palin. The ability to reproduce has no bearing on whether or not she could lead this country. By using motherhood as a rationale, no President or Vice President in the history of the United States has been qualified to serve. If this rationale was to be applied, would that mean those who are infertile or childless by choice would automatically be disqualified from high political office?

2. “Sarah Palin is an ordinary person.” Absolutely correct, there’s absolutely nothing in her background that qualifies as an outstanding achievement that is relevant to being one heartbeat away from the Presidency. Why do Americans treasure mediocrity? Does it make them feel better about themselves? Since when is being accomplished and educated a drawback in the eyes of the American people? We go into serious debt to send our kids and ourselves to college, so that shows we place high value on education. So why, when a well-educated person like Barack Obama runs for high office, is he suddenly characterized as elitist and “uppity.” Careful folks, I may have to bring the “r” word into play.

3. “The media is mean to her!” Waaahhh. You mean that Palin, unlike any other politician since the advent of mass communication, should be exempt from the same level of scrutiny to which all other candidates are subjected? Don’t tell me it’s because she’s a woman, because it would be completely sexist to assume either that she shouldn’t have to explain herself, her actions and her views, or that she can’t handle the pressure. If (Goddess forbid!) McCain is elected and kicks the bucket – four melanomas will do that to a person, pretty quickly – and Know-Nothing Palin winds up in the Oval Office, she’d have to handle tremendous pressure. Unless, that is, she plans to let her husband run the show… and the country.

4. “She’s qualified.” How? What in her moose-eating, wolf-killing, abstinence-teaching life has even remotely qualified her to be VP, and possibly President? Just in the last day or two, Palin once again demonstrated her complete ignorance of foreign policy by calling Henry Kissinger “naïve” and claiming he didn’t know how to negotiate effectively. Excuse me? The only thing she’s negotiated is the money-losing sale of that plane in Alaska, maybe her kid’s bedtimes and allowances, and the upcoming marriage of her underage pregnant daughter. Palin’s ignorance is the truly dangerous, arrogant type that causes her not to realize how ignorant she really is, and to stick by her guns (pun intended) until the rest of the world comes around to her way of thinking. Palin’s ignorance doesn’t leave room for new information and new perspectives. Palin’s ignorance is the kind that, at the very least, will make the US an even bigger laughingstock with the international community, and at worst, may kill millions of people, soldiers and civilians, through her arrogance.

5. “Palin is a good Christian.” How’s that again? Please define “good” so we’re all talking about the same thing. According to Sam Harris' "When Atheists Attack" (Newsweek 9/29/08),

“In the churches where Palin has worshiped for decades, parishioners enjoy "baptism in the Holy Spirit," "miraculous healings" and "the gift of tongues." Invariably, they offer astonishingly irrational accounts of this behavior and of its significance for the entire cosmos. Palin's spiritual colleagues describe themselves as part of "the final generation," engaged in "spiritual warfare" to purge the earth of "demonic strongholds." Palin has spent her entire adult life immersed in this apocalyptic hysteria. Ask yourself: Is it a good idea to place the most powerful military on earth at her disposal? Do we actually want our leaders thinking about the fulfillment of Biblical prophecy when it comes time to say to the Iranians, or to the North Koreans, or to the Pakistanis, or to the Russians or to the Chinese: "All options remain on the table"?

Personally this scares the crap out of me. I look at the Presidential election process as an extended job interview, during which I assess the qualifications of the candidates and choose the one that I think will do the best job of leading the country. Religion plays no part in my choice, although it may with some. However, Palin’s believe that we’re already in some sort of Biblical “end times” has the capacity to become a self-fulfilling prophecy. What if Palin (again, Goddess forbid!) winds up being in charge of the infamous “button” when a conflict with another nation becomes heated, and she chooses to press the button because God told her that whatever nation she wants to bomb is a “demonic stronghold”? Do we really want to go back into the dark ages and let religion control the actions of politicians and governments? That’s what Palin brings to the table.

Peace,
AuntieM